Insight
Federal Budget 2026–27: Major Tax Reforms for Businesses, Trusts and Investors
Learn about the new Division 296 tax on superannuation and upcoming changes to contribution caps, effective from 1 July 2026.…
Read more
Reports arrive. Advisers are in place. The structure looks right.
Then the board proposes a restructure. Tax assumes one structure. Commercial assumes another. Wealth wasn't in either. The board is about to commit. You're the one holding the pieces.
The issue isn't competence. It's alignment.
Three advisers at the table. Tax efficiency, legal exposure, operational impact. Sound in isolation. Untested against each other.
BLG tests tax position, commercial logic, and wealth implications against each other before the board commits. What happens to your personal position if the deal structure changes. Whether the tax assumptions hold if timing slips. What breaks if the seller’s terms shift in due diligence.
Not reconstructed for each decision. Managed across them.
The adviser who tested last year’s capital decision is the one in this conversation. What was understood then is already in the room.
Board conversations resolve rather than repeat. Capital decisions move without unresolved assumptions. You stop being the only one holding it all together.
These aren’t isolated services. They’re decisions carrying business, wealth, structure, timing, and personal consequence together.
When decisions connect tax, structure, succession, and personal wealth, the gaps between them become the risk. BLG brings these together.